.
Feedback

Healthcare Reform An Even Bigger Victory for Long Island Than You Thought

Just a few years before the Affordable Care Act was passed, researchers at Adelphi University's School of Nursing found that over 16% of Long Islanders had no health insurance whatsoever.

Long Islanders have a good reason to celebrate: the Supreme Court of the United States has upheld the most important aspects of the Affordable Care Act(ACA).

While the language of the Court's opinion can be a little tough to get through (see scotusblog.com for more information), the victory is that the majority of the justices decided that the government could compel all Americans to buy insurance by 2014. Their main point of contention was that rather an "individual mandate" to buy insurance, the court is interpreting this as a tax, which they agree is within the power of the Congress to draft.

Back in March, LIPC led a group of Long Islanders in wishing a "Happy Birthday" to ACA on its second anniversary, even handing out cake to college students who are recieving some of the first benefits of the law. We knew that it was going to be a struggle to preserve affordable health care, but with todays decision, everyone's hard work has paid off.

Just a few years before ACA was passed, researchers at Adelphi University's School of Nursing found that over 16% of Long Islanders had no health insurance whatsoever. These are regular folks like yourself, but who don't have the money to buy expensive individual insurance, and fall through the cracks of Medicaid. These are the people that the Supreme Court has supported today, giving them hope that they won't have to choose between bankruptcy and healthcare. But this isn't just a Long Island victory; it's a victory across the state.

The decision is a victory for the 150,000 young adults in New York who now can get coverage by staying on their parent’s plans due to the so called “under 26 provision.” Young adults will be protected as they go to graduate school, struggle with unemployment after college or struggle to make ends meet with a job that doesn’t provide health coverage. Many more will benefit in the future.

It’s a victory for the millions of New Yorkers who won’t have to have second thoughts about going to the doctor to get services like blood pressure testing and cholesterol screening, because the law prohibits consumers from being charged for preventive services. It’s a victory for millions of New Yorkers who will no longer have to worry about economic ruin if they get serious conditions like cancer because the law stops insurance companies from establishing so called “lifetime limits” on how much their health insurer will pay for their disease or illness.

And, it’s a victory for all New Yorkers, because New York can move forward with its plans to create a health insurance exchange – a Costco’s or Sam’s Club for health insurance. The exchange will provide quality health coverage to well over a million individuals: allowing individuals to save over two-thirds of their health premiums. And the exchange will help you pick out the health insurance plan that meets your needs, and protect you against insurance company bureaucrats that seek to deny you care just because it’s good for their bottom line.

The battle isn't over yet, though, and Long Islanders who are interested in finding new ways to support the Affordable Care Act should contact us at the Long Island Progressive Coalition, at administration@lipc.org or 516.541.1006.

K. Edaw July 7, 2012 at 08:46 pm
Rob Onion
Social security is bankrupt. Need I remind you that last summer the President was threatening all Social security recipients with the loss of social security checks due to the lack of a passed budget. There is no Social Security trust fund. The government borrowed all the funds. There is more money coming out of ss then going in. We can't fund social security as presently constituted. Add the new healthcare tax, who will pay for all this. Social security is doing more than it was ever intended to do, great causes but we can't afford it. You still think this is a successful program? Social security was a Good idea but the govt can't run anything efficiently. That is the inherent problem you can't rely on the govt if you do you are doomed for failure.
K. Edaw July 7, 2012 at 08:49 pm
Vincent
Your leaving out the Middle Easterns and Asians that also cross the boarders although in smaller numbers , but probably with different motives.
Joanne Toresko July 7, 2012 at 10:38 pm
The fundamental issue here, and you seem to agree with me, is the 15 member panel can make policy changes to Medicare coverage without going through Congress. This is absolutely unprecedented. Previously MedPac RECOMMENDED changes to Medicare rules and rates but needed AN ACT OF CONGRESS TO TAKE EFFECT. The new panel is allowed to ignore that all important initial legislative step. Your elected official's direct responsibility in making any changes to the program, has now been bypassed.
It's so ominous that there has been strong bipartisan support for it's repeal.
Eva Salzman July 7, 2012 at 11:56 pm
When it comes to those middle eastern people or foreigners make assumptions first, ask questions later:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/06/511984/96-year-old-latino-former-arizona-governor-detained-by-border-patrol-in-100-degree-heat/?mobile=nc But then again the rest of the world does exactly that about Americans. We're all assumed to be ignorant, selfish and whole lot of other things....which nonsence I object to strongly, have spent years doing so. But then if a lot of Americans do same about foreigners I guess it's fair enough to lump us all in together and make assumptions like this, I can't help thinking, reading some of the posts here about those foreigner immigrants. Fair enough, right?!
Happy Feet July 8, 2012 at 12:12 am
Interesting comment. Do you mean the giant corporations that are bleeding the middle class dry? The mortgage banks that swindled people out of their homes? The banks that conveniently "lost" people's mortgages? Or do you mean the mega corps like the Koch brothers' Georgia Pacific company that lets toxic waste water wander through the countryside in people's back yards giving people cancer, asthma, lung problems and more? They pay a small fine, and continue poisoning our air, water, and land? What about the oil companies that pay big bucks to buy exemptions from the Clean Air and Clean Water Act? These are the real lawbreakers that should go to jail. They are stealing our children's and grandchildren's futures.
Happy Feet July 8, 2012 at 12:13 am
Obviously, you've never had a sick child. Your indifference is amazing.
A.F. July 8, 2012 at 12:18 am
And let's not forget that the taxpayer pays an inflated cost for those services, which are usually performed at a hospital emergency room. So, let's see if we have this straight - inadequate care at a much higher cost. Brilliant!
Simba July 8, 2012 at 12:33 am
You want a better health care system, get our money out of Iraq and Afghanistan, stop trying to improve their infrastructure and fix ours. Create infrastructure jobs, isn't that what Obama promised when he ran for office. CNN reported that Germany averages 21 minutes of power outages a year. 21 MINUTES and here we have over a million out because of heat. Why because the German thinking is how do we build it better and they do it. We could care less as long as we can buy it.
How about making a commitment to having the best education system in the world, so we can become a better educated workforce, create more engineering jobs, rebuild our manufacturing industry. Which all leads to when you have a job, you can buy healthcare and you don't need a gov't tax to force you into it. You should have the right to choose, and you would if you had a job.
Dad of Three July 8, 2012 at 01:06 am
Ms Toresko completely ignored the facts pointed out by Lido resident, and went on to distort what the advisory board can do, and what it cannot do.
Why am I not surprised with this "earth is flat" approach to everything?
SashaK July 8, 2012 at 03:28 am
Rob Onion..I spent months reading the bill itself..I don't need to listen to anyone as you refer to. I am not lazy and sit on the side lines listening to any side. I do/did my own research. What a typical liberal response you just gave me. You have no idea who I am , what job I have, or the fact that I am an independent researcher...How much time have you spent reviewing Executive Orders? Bills in Legislation....Sadly you will find out the hard way as will many. Good luck..I sure hope you have your health on your side. Let me say this..God forbid something happens to you or your loved one..when the Dr says "There's nothing else we can do" Do you know that you can trust that answer?Will there be that thought that "maybe" there is but since it may be too costly it may not(can't) be offered? Since the person may be "too old" it may not(can't) be offered... Ponder those thoughts for the future.I won't sit an argue who's right or wrong.That will be made clear in the future.Know that the place I come from is not wanting anyones lives cut short ...
robkoz July 8, 2012 at 03:38 am
I have to admit Germany has their act together. It's too bad they're surrounded by idiots that the Federal Reserve had to bail out multiple times. But on that note Germany doesn't get hammered by freeloaders decade after decade like the US does. Like Australia and Switzerland, Germany has their country on lockdown so if you want to be a part of their country you have to be a productive member of society. Here in the US you just have to pledge yourself to the Democratic party....
robkoz July 8, 2012 at 03:54 am
@ K. Edaw, Didn't Nancy Pelosi say we had to pass bills to see what's inside it? And you're telling us that we still don't know what's inside it?
Joanne Toresko July 8, 2012 at 03:54 am
The Independent Payment Advisory Board has the ability to do as I described. Are you claiming they DO NOT HAVE THE POWER to initially bypass Congress when making changes to Medicare? Are they not a group of unelected officials?
Lido Resident gave additional information that I neither disputed or distorted. My initial point, and to me the most critical point is, this new bureaucracy fundamentally changes the dynamic with decisions affecting Medicare policy and coverage. I even highlighted, referencing MedPac, how your elected officials were directly responsible for changes in the program, and now they're not. Members of both parties are uncomfortable with this part of the law. Given the current political climate, that should tell us all something Where, specifically have I been incorrect on what the Advisory Board can and cannot do?
John Rennhack July 8, 2012 at 04:20 am
Robkoz, you're mistaken about immigration both legal and illegal in Germany.
BTW, it is interesting that illegals are considered "freeloaders" but at the same time "are taking our jobs." A recent study showed that illegals with fake SS numbers are paying into a system they will never take from. The same goes for medicare. Employers are deducting from paychecks and sending it to the IRS. The numbers are staggering. SSA reports $189Billion during the 90's. This decade it's about $7billion/year to social security and $1.5Billion in medicare deductions.
DaddyGuru July 8, 2012 at 04:31 am
Reminds me of an old Appalachian saying , The English build churches, the Irish build stills. And the Germans build barns
robkoz July 8, 2012 at 04:47 am
@ John, sorry but you can't contribute to the system if you're unemployed and doing nothing but procreating and abusing taxpayer services/entitlements. Do you really believe that 20+million illegal immigrants are all working? Medicaid, WIC and sometimes even Section 8 housing is what illegals abuse the most. I would know. I read their charts. Oh and don't forget educational costs. But I don't feel bad about illegals not getting SS. It's the least they can do for not having the courage to walk through the front door.
As for what I'm mistaken about I'd like to hear it.
MrsE July 11, 2012 at 03:08 pm
The source is my own personal insurance coverage through my employer who employs less than 50 employees. These businesses will be forced to drop their insurane benefit because it is not cost effective. The pool is small number of employees in this particular business with this policy that now has to cover everything...it costs more. The proof is in the pudding, big government take over of anything is inefficient and costs too much. Why screw with everyone, when a small percentage of people require the ability to competitively aquire insurance? This non solution negatively impacts many who already have insurance and continues to leave a ton of people without coverage.
Happy Feet July 12, 2012 at 02:59 am
Death panels are already here...they are the private insurance companies. They drop you if you get sick, they refuse to cover you if you have a pre-existing condition, they decide that they will not pay for a medication or not. They are permitted to spend only 80-85% on actual healthcare. On the other hand, Medicare spends approximately 97% on healthcare. The Veterans Administration Healthcare is another very efficient administration of excellent healthcare (which needs to be expanded, due to the huge number of wounded servicemen & women from Afghanistan & Iraq). My best friend has been unable to get health insurance since being diagnosed with cancer in 2001. The Affordable Healthcare Act will most certainly help her and millions of Americans like her...and that's no fantasy!
Walter Keenan July 12, 2012 at 03:10 am
@ Jsharks23 - Even if you walk into an ER in need of a heart or lung transplant, even with the best healthcare in the world - I'm sorry to say, "Your ship has already sailed". At that moment it time it will already be to late for you. This country has some damn fine Dr.'s but they don't keep these parts in stock like your local mechanic.
Now even without insurance they will do their best to treat and comfort the symptoms you are having at the time of your arrival.
Happy Feet July 12, 2012 at 03:29 am
Vincent: Of the 5 taxes you mentioned, none will affect ALL middle-class people. 1)The medical device tax does not affect most people. 2) The high medical bills tax will only affect those who have unusually high medical bills. Right now, the exemption is 7.5% and it will be increased to 10%. However, I would not be surprised it this tax is later tweaked to go back to 7.5%. 3) The Flex Spending Cap will affect mostly those with families or those who expect to spend over $2500. With so much preventive care totally covered, many people, especially singles, will never reach this number. I believe that $2500 was the original cap when the FLEX accounts first started. Again, this is something that could easily be changed. 4) The surtax on investment income will not affect the majority of the middle class, since most "middle class" people do not derive their income from investment income; 5) The Medicare Payroll tax increase would not affect everyone either. Only those who make over 250K a year would pay an additional $450 for Medicare---again, most "middle class" are not in that category.
Nassau Taxpayer July 12, 2012 at 11:29 am
"[Private insurance companies] are permitted to spend only 80-85% on actual healthcare. On the other hand, Medicare spends approximately 97% on healthcare."
Private insurers are REQUIRED by state law to spend AT LEAST 80-85% of premium income (82% in New York) on health care. Absent the mandate to spend 80-85%, left to their own devices they would spend far less. Where does the 15-20% of premium income go? Claims Administration -- to deny claims and deter spending of premiums on health care. Executve salaries -- healthcare CEOs are making in the tens of million cash salaries (along with Cadillac health care benefits) and a multiple of that in deferred compensation. Absent the state mandates to spend 80-85% of subscriber premiums on subscriber healthcare, claims denial would be even more aggressive and CEOs would stuff even more in their own fat cat pockets.
Preliator July 12, 2012 at 01:12 pm
And liberals tax them all.
John Gruber July 12, 2012 at 01:40 pm
if you people are so concerned that this healthcare bill will lead to "communism" and full blown "socialism" in America you can move to canada...oh, wait, THEY GOT THE SAME THING THERE TO and pretty much every other country you'd consider moving to that isn't considered 3rd world. it's time to accept the fact that universal healthcare is a GOOD THING and that it CAN work. But once again people are more concerned with "left and right", and "communist and socialist" which leads to people leaving moronic comments like "anyone who supports this is a communist and socialist" and whatnot. people, I really suggest you do your thinking with your ENTIRE brain and not just the left or right side of it. There's obviously a way this can work otherwise pretty much an entire continent wouldn't have done something similar years ago but again, so many of you people are to concerced with the interests of your political party you lack much of the free ability to think for yourself
A.F. July 12, 2012 at 02:12 pm
John, you said a mouthful. This should not be a political issue at all . You can always count on the mouth breathers on the right to decry anything they don't agree with as "socialism" (even though they can't define it) The far left is not blameless either, as they too have polticized the issue. In general, however, the left has sought dialogue, compromise, and progress on the issue, while the right wing remains focused on its core values: disinformation, greed, and xenophobia.
Mary Beth July 12, 2012 at 02:26 pm
A.F. and John Gruber, thank goodness we are finally hearing some sane comments on this topic. No one opposed to this can explain how adding 30million people to the rolls of PRIVATE insurers can be called "socialism"
Happy Feet July 12, 2012 at 02:32 pm
Nassau Taxpayer, thanks for the correction of a poor choice of words on my part. Yes, under the Affordable Care Act, now insurance companies will be REQUIRED in ALL states to pay a minimum of 80% of premiums on actual health care (the 80/20 rule). If they don't, they will have to give a refund to their clients. You are also correct in stating that without this mandate, insurance companies would deny even more claims and make their CEO's salary & benefits even greater.
Eva Salzman July 12, 2012 at 03:22 pm
Wow, this thread is still running. Can't agree more Mary Beth about sane comments from A.F., John Gruber and others too here I can recall. And good point about how adding 30 million people to rolls of private insurers can be called "socialism". But a lot of that argument seems to be underpinned by racism, that there's this huge amount of immigrants free-loading with it conveniently forgotten that around here a lot of the agricultural business depends on cheap labor which immigrants will do....which brings us round to issues of fair pay and minimum wage which I guess some see as "leftie" issues which they're not! And the biggest free-loaders seem to be the bankers and corporations who are meant to generate jobs thanks to tax breaks but after ten years of these where are the jobs? !
Eva Salzman July 13, 2012 at 03:08 pm
Okay everyone here's a quiz about Affordable Health Care act to stop all misinformation! How'd you do? http://healthreform.kff.org/quizzes/health-reform-quiz/
Eva Salzman July 13, 2012 at 03:12 pm
And here's FOX business. IS this very same Fox news?! (Have been out of country for many years....) Anyway, the heading of the article is something about "surprising" perks which is odd since these aren't surprising to to anyone who's followed what the new law entails. Certainly shouldn't be surprising to FOX as a supposedly a leading news source, right? http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2012/07/06/affordable-care-act-what-dont-know-could-help/
Sharon Culit July 31, 2012 at 09:43 am
Still, despite our healthcare reform, we should do our best to take care of ourselves. In order to do this, we need to work out ourselves and use an adequate trainer like the TRX which is available at www.trxtraining.com or www.traineroutlet.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Farmingdale Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Maggie June 12, 2013 at 11:06 am
Hate to sound like an old woman, but when it was Von Leeson's it was always a joy to be there. AllRead More the staff had been there for years and treated the customers like family. Food was consistently good and they never "ran out" of anything. This place shouldn't be open for business. The poor kid waiting on us last time had to come to me and tell me they had no dessert to have with coffee other than ice cream. We left him a nice tip and I told him to find a job somewhere else; he'd never make any money there. It's a great location. We just need some smart business people to run it!
alterego June 14, 2013 at 06:54 am
went there for breakfast the morning of the fair several weeks ago. First, how do you screw upRead More breakfast order? The young man server was doing his best, but still eggs, potatoes, and hash, no potatoes come, begged for coffee refills, ketchup was the very bottom of a heinz bottle. The excuse was sorry we have a new cook,..something tells me that aint the only problem, how does one screw up breakfast. Sorry wont be going back any time soon, unless I see a new mngment or new owner sign.
Vinny June 16, 2013 at 08:30 pm
. This place is just not good. There is nothing appealing about poor service and absolutely horribleRead More food. It should have stayed closed when it went out of business not long ago. I hope the employees can find another means .